Rushi S/O Minu Tarapurwala v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 CriApln 461/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 461 OF 2016 Rushi s/o Minu Tarapurwala APPLICANT V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

RESPONDENTS Mr. D.M. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.R. Borulkar, A.P.P. for the Respondent No. 1 - State CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & V.K JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 30th June, 2016 PER COURT :

1.

The applicant is accused no. 1 in Crime No. 25 of 2012 of Nawapur Police Station, District Nandurbar. He is accused for committing offence under Section 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3 (1)(10) of the Atrocities Act. The complainant is one Sunita, who alleged that her son was married to daughter of her own brother. But, there occurred dispute between the families due to illtreatment of the bride. On 17th June, 2012, it is alleged that the applicant and complainant's brother Dipak visited her house and abuses were hurled by the applicant on the basis of scheduled tribe status of the complainant.

2 CriApln 461/2016 2.

Thereafter, a compromise took place between complainant's son and Dipak's daughter. As such, there is no reason why we should continue this complaint. Even otherwise, the complaint deserves quashing because on the face of it, it appears a false accusation. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. ( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) srm/30/6/16