Narayan Ramrao Badar v. Shweta Ashish Sethi

{1} wp124517.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1245 OF 2017 Narayan s/o Ramrao Badar, age: 59 years, Occ: Business, R/o Jodwalsa, Tq. Bhokardan, District Jalna.

Petitioner

Versus

Shweta w/o Ashish Sethi, age: 39 years, Occ: Business, R/o Sethi Chambers, Kiranachawdi, Aurangabad.

Respondent Mr.Dhananjay Mane, advocate holding for Mr.Umesh Bodkhe, advocate for the petitioner Mr.A.H.Kasliwal, advocate holding for Mr.A.D.Kasliwal, advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM : S.B.SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 08th February, 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT:

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties. On going through the impugned order, I do not see any patent illegality or arbitrariness in the same. The only defence, petitioner proposes to take in this case, is that though he issued cheque, he issued it in blank form. But, the petitioner has not given any reason as to why he issued the cheque in blank form. He has also not given the reason as to why various amounts have been transferred at the behest of Respondent-plaintiff. Merely taking a defence for the sake of defence could not have been

{2} wp124517.odt permitted by the learned Civil Judge and this is what he has done in the instant case.

I see no merit in this petition and same stands dismissed with costs. Rule discharged.

S.B.SHUKRE JUDGE adb/wp124517