Bombay High CourtWP/940/2014disposed offdismissed for default
Anil Balaji Bade v. The Divisional Controller, Msrtc, Latur
2015-02-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh1 pages
940.14wp -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 940 OF 2014 Anil Balaji Bade.
...Petitioner
versus The Divisional Controller, MSRTC, Latur.
...Respondent
.....
Mr. Prakash M. Shinde, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.S. Bagul, Advocate for respondent.
.....
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2015 ORAL ORDER :
.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner resiles to the situation that writ petition has been rendered infructuous, since the petitioner is not in service.
2.
In view of this, writ petition stands disposed of, as infructuous.
[ SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. ] Tupe/09.02.15