Digambar Haridas Pandit v. The State Of Maharasthra And Others

1 wp 2551&2745.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 945 WRIT PETITION NO.2551 OF 2021 DIGAMBAR HARIDAS PANDIT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner:

Mr. Swapnil Joshi i/b. M/s. J. P. Legal Associates AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. K. N. Lokhande ...

945 WRIT PETITION NO.2745 OF 2021 ARUN KARBHARI SHINDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner:

Mr. Swapnil Joshi i/b. M/s. J. P. Legal Associates AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. K. N. Lokhande ...

CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE: 09th FEBRUARY, 2021 PER COURT:

1.

The learned A.G.P. submits that the petitioners have an alternate remedy before the Joint Director.

2.

In view of that, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that they will avail alternate remedy.

2 wp 2551&2745.2021 3.

In light of above, writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail alternate remedy. In that event, all contentions of the parties are kept open.

4.

For a period of fifteen (15) days, the interim orders passed by this Court shall continue in favour of the petitioners so as to enable them to approach the appellate authority and seek necessary orders.

5.

Needless to say, on lapse of fifteen (15) days, the interim protection granted by this Court would come to an end.

6.

The appellate authority shall consider the documents produced by all the parties and shall take decision on its own merits.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe