Laxman Pandurang Sonawane v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 5,6 CA-6478-17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 5 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6478 OF 2017 IN FA/3622/2008 WITH FA/3229/2009 WITH X-OBJST/5289/2015 IN FA/3229/2009 WITH FA/3230/2009 WITH FA/3231/2009 WITH FA/3237/2009 WITH CA/11908/2009 IN FA/3237/2009 WITH FA/3238/2009 WITH XOBJST/8170/2014 WITH CA/6471/2017 IN FA/3621/2008 WITH CA/6477/2017 IN FA/3621/2008 WITH CA/6479/2017 IN FA/3622/2008 WITH CA/6480/2017 IN FA/3617/2008 WITH CA/6481/2017 IN FA/3617/2008 WITH CA/6482/2017 IN FA/3618/2008 WITH CA/6483/2017 IN FA/3619/2008 WITH CA/6484/2017 IN FA/3619/2008 WITH CA/6485/2017 IN FA/3620/2008 MAHADEO JAIRAM DHAWAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S. L. Bhapkar.

AGP for Respondent State : Mr. S. P. Sonpawale. AGP for Respondent No.2 : Mr. G. B. Rajale.

...

6 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6576 OF 2017 IN FA/4133/2008 WITH CA/6577/2017 IN FA/4133/2008 LAXMAN PANDURANG SONAWANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. C. V. Dharurkar. AGP for Respondent State : Mr. S. P. Sonpawale. AGP for Respondent No.2 : Mr. G. B. Rajale.

...

CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATED : 24th AUGUST, 2017.

Order :- Heard learned counsel for parties.

Perused the applications. Applicant-Original claimant seeks amendment in the memo of appeal. The proposed amendment would not change the nature of the proceedings nor it affect adversely interest of the respondent State. Therefore, there is no impediment to allow the application for amendment.

2 5,6 CA-6478-17 2.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. The applicant-original claimants to carry out necessary amendment within stipulated period. No order as to the costs. Accordingly, applications for amendment stand disposed of.

3.

List the remaining matters for further process on 19th September, 2017.

[ K. K. SONAWANE ] JUDGE MTK