Hanumant S/O Gunwant Patil And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 CrApln 449-2017 ju

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 449 OF 2017 1] Shri Hanumant Gunwant Patil, Age : 26 years, Occupation :

Service Military, 2] Sow Sojarabai Gunwant Patil, Age : 48 years, Occupation :

Household, 3] Shri Gunwant Bhujangrao Patil, Age : 52 years, Occupation :

Agriculture, 4] Shri Shiwaji Gunwant Patil, Age : 28 years, Occupation :

Service Military, 5] Sow Suchita Shivaji Patil, Age : 25 years, Occupation :

Household, 6] Shri Sheshrao Gunwant Patil, Age : Major, Occupation :

Agriculture, 7] Sow Jyotika Sheshrao Patil, Age : 24 years, Occupation :

Household All above R/o Takalgano. Tq. Chakur Dist. Latur.

8] Karuna Balaji Tagre, Age : Major, Occupation :

Household, R/o Shindikamath, Tq. Deoni, Dist.

Latur, At present Shrinagar Workshop Corner, Nanded.

...Applicants

Versus

2 CrApln 449-2017 ju 1] The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Deoni.

2] Sow. Ashwini Hanumant Patil, Age : 22 years, Occupation :

Household, R/o Takalgaon, At present Yenki, Tq. Deoni, Dist.

Latur.

...Respondents

.......

Mr. G. L. Deshpande, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. M. M. Nerlikar, A. P. P. for Respondent No. 1-State. Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. .......

CORAM :

T. V. NALAWADE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE :

19-12-2018.

JUDGMENT : [Per Shri T. V. Nalawade, J] 01.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard finally.

02.

The proceeding has been filed under Section 482 of Cr. P. C. for quashing and setting aside the F. I. R. vide C. R. No. 206 of 2016 registered with Deoni Police Station, Latur for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 313, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of I. P. C. During arguments the learned Counsels of the applicants and first informant have submitted that the parties have settled the dispute and divorce by mutual consent is

3 CrApln 449-2017 ju obtained. The copy of the said decision is produced on record and it appears that it came to be decided on 21.12.2017. The learned A. P. P. is also heard. In view of the nature of dispute and settlement which is filed on the record, this Court holds that relief needs to be granted.

03.

Hence, following order;

ORDER

(i)Application is allowed.

(ii)The relief is granted in terms of prayer clause "C".

(iii)Rule made absolute in those terms.

[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [T. V. NALAWADE] JUDGE JUDGE Dahibhate/-