The State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Fakira Payrelal Shaikh

{1} 971 sr. no.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6023 OF 2015 IN FAST/2272/2015 WITH CA/6025/2015 IN FAST/2246/2015 WITH CA/6027/2015 IN FAST/2276/2015 WITH CA/6029/2015 IN FAST/2280/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

BABURAO RAMRAO PANCHAL AND ANOTHER ...

AGP for Applicants : Mr. S.P. Sonpawale.

Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mrs. S. L. Puri. CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J.

DATE : 11th DECEMBER,2015.

PER COURT:

1] These are applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act. 2] Mrs. Puri learned counsel for the non applicants submits that delay in filing appeal is not sufficiently explained, therefore, the applications are liable to be rejected.

3] Perusal of the averments made in the applications shows that delay is sufficiently explained and the averments made in the applications are not controverted. Hence, the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Delay in filing the First Appeals is condoned. [A.M. BADAR, J] grt/-