Saber Hussain Gulam Hussain Siddiqui And ANR v. The State Of Mah And ORS

{1} 904 sr. no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3261 OF 2013 SABER HUSSAIN GULAM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTR AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Pravin N. Kalani. AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. A. M. Phule. Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Satyajit S. Bora. Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 & 5 : Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar. . . .

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2016.

PER COURT:

1] Mr. Kalani, learned counsel submits that 3 times, notices were issued by the Municipal Council, now Corporation. However, no further concrete steps were taken by the Municipal Corporation for removal of unauthorized construction. An affidavit is filed stating that the said notice issued by the Corporation was assailed by the respondent nos. 4 and 5 before the Civil Court and Status-quo is granted.

2] In view of that, no orders can be passed in the present petition. In case, some orders are passed by the Civil Court, parties and the Corporation would act in tune with the orders passed by the Civil Court. 3] Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[A.M. BADAR] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-