Sanjay Shesherao Rathod v. Chief Executive Officer Zp Osmanabad And Another

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1677 OF 2017 Shri Sanjay S/o Sheshrao Rathod Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders Mr.B.V.Thombre, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Y.G.Gujrathi, A.G.P. for the State.

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.L.WADANE,JJ.

Date : 08.02.2017.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned A.G.P. raises a preliminary objection that the petitioner has a remedy of appeal under Rule 13 of the Zilla Parishad (Discipline and Appeal) Rules.

3.

In view of that, though Mr.Thombre, learned counsel sought to canvass submissions on merits, we are not inclined to consider the same.

4.

The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy.

5.

All contentions kept open.

6.

In case such an appeal is filed by the petitioner, the

appellate authority shall decide the same on its own merits after hearing all parties concerned in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within six (6) months.

7.

The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(K.L.WADANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.08.02.2017.

asp/office/wp1677.17