Shailaja Ganesh Patil v. Ganesh Devidas Patil

{1} mca26-16 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.26 OF 2016 Shailaja Ganesh Patil APPLICANT Age - 23 years, Occ - Household R/o C/o Ajay Shivajirao Pawar, Sai-Shraddha Housing Society, A-4/4, Shirdi, Taluka - Rahata, District - Ahmednagar

VERSUS

Ganesh Devidas Patil (Thakare) RESPONDENT Age - 27 years, Occ - Service, R/o Sector No.27-A, Plot No.19/5, Near TSJB, Pradhikaran, Nigadi, Pune - 411 044 .......

Mr. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for the applicant .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 26 th AUGUST, 2016 ORAL JUDGMENT :

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with consent of learned advocate for the applicant. 2.

In spite of service of notice, the respondent has chosen to abstain from appearing in the matter. In the circumstances, the position goes unchallenged that some proceedings have been initiated by present applicant in the court at Rahata and further

{2} mca26-16 that the marriage, which has been solemnized in 2015, appears to have taken untoward turn immediately and the applicant is since then been residing at Shirdi at her paternal home. The respondent appears to have filed proceedings, purportedly for restitution of conjugal rights at Pune.

3.

In view of aforesaid, since proceedings filed by the applicant are pending at Rahata and she is residing in Rahata taluka, it would be expedient that the proceedings initiated by the respondent at Pune be transferred to Kopargaon, as prayed for by the applicant in present Miscellaneous Civil Application. 4.

As such, the Miscellaneous Civil Application stands allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause "B". [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/mca26-16