← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1285/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Khushal Mitharam Patil And Others v. Tahasildar Jalgaon And Others

2017-01-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V. M. Kanade2 pages

1 34-WP-1285.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1285 OF 2017 Khushal Mitharam Patil and ors.

..Petitioners Vs.

Tahsildar, Raver and ors.

..Respondents -- Mr.R.B.Ade, Advocate for petitioners Mr.S.G.Karlekar, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2 Mr.S.S.Naik, Advocate for respondent no.3 -- CORAM : V.M. KANADE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 25, 2017 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

The petitioners are challenging the notice dated 12.01.2017 issued by respondent no.2 - Circle Officer, Raver, asking the petitioners to deliver possession of the agricultural land prescribed in prayer clause (D) of this petition, in view of the order dated 18.05.2016 passed by the Tahsildar .

2 34-WP-1285.odt 3.

In our view, the petitioners have an alternate remedy of filing appeal against the order passed by the Tahsildar under Sections 29(2) and 25(2) of the The Maharashtra Tenancy And Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

4.

The learned Counsel for respondent no.3, on instructions, states that respondent no.3 will not take steps in view of the order dated 18.05.2016 passed by the Tahsildar, for a period of one week from today.

5.

In view the statement made on behalf of respondent no.3, nothing survives in this petition. Reserving the right of the petitioners to avail of the alternate remedy, the Writ Petition is disposed. All contentions of respondent no.3 are kept open.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [V.M. KANADE, J.] kbp