Jaya Ravi Kakade v. Samadhan Rangnath Muley And Another

{1} 929 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 929 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4497 OF 2014 IN FAST/2318/2014 JAYA RAVI KAKADE

VERSUS

SAMADHAN RANGNATH MULEY AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Qadri Taher Ali h/f Zia Ul Mustafa CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 15th September, 2017.

PER COURT:

Heard the learned counsel for applicant. Despite service of notice, none appears for respondent No.1. Perused the application and the findings expressed by the learned Tribunal. For the reasons stated in the application, I do not find any impediment to condone the delay. Accordingly, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (C). Delay caused in filing first appeal is hereby condoned. Registry to take requisite steps for further process. After due compliance, appeal be kept for hearing on admission in due course.

[K.K. SONAWANE] JUDGE.

grt/-