Ramrao Eknath Bandapalle And Others v. Vinayak Gurunath Kaname And Others

10680.19CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 952 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10680 OF 2019 IN SAST/2486/2019 RAMRAO EKNATH BANDAPALLE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

VINAYAK GURUNATH KANAME AND OTHERS ...

Mr.S.V. Gundre, Advocate for applicants.

Mr.S.S. Manale, Advocate for respondent no.4. Mr. S.N. Morampalle, A.G.P. for respondent nos.5 and 6.

...

CORAM: V.L. ACHLIYA,J.

DATE : 14.02.2020 ORAL ORDER:

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents.

Mr.S.S. Manale, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent nos.1 to 4. He undertakes to file Vakalatnama for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr.Morampalle, learned A.G.P.

accepts notice for respondent nos.5 and 6.

3.

Upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned counsel representing the respondents and considering the fact that the delay is of only two days for which the applicants have assigned the reasons, I am of the view that the delay

10680.19CA.odt deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B. Delay condoned. Appeal be registered, subject to removal of office objection and place for admission on 1st April, 2020.

4.

Civil application is disposed of in above terms.

[V.L. ACHLIYA] JUDGE SGA