← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/2598/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Musthafa Rajasaheb Tamboli v. The Executive Enginee, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur And ORS

2017-02-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2598 OF 2017 IN FA/1794/2014 MUSTHAFA RAJASAHEB TAMBOLI

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEE, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, LATUR AND ORS ...

942 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2599 OF 2017 IN FA/1779/2014 SHESHRAO PIRAJI PAWAR

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, LATUR AND ORS ...

943 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2600 OF 2017 IN FA/1718/2014 SANTOSH JAGANNATH KASLE AND ORS

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, LATUR AND ORS ...

944 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2603 OF 2017 IN FA/1799/2014 NAGNATH VITTHAL SALUNKE THR GPA KISHOR V. KOLHE

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, LATUR AND ORS ...

947 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2606 OF 2017 IN FA/2319/2014 RAGHUNATH NAGA TIGHILE

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, LATUR AND ORS

948 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2607 OF 2017 IN FA/2320/2014 ASHOK GOVIND MERU THR G.P.A KISHOR V. KOLHE

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, LATUR AND ORS ...

959 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2755 OF 2017 IN FA/1681/2014 TUKARAM NIVRATI TIGHILE

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, LATUR AND ORS 960 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2757 OF 2017 IN FA/1726/2014 AJITABI RAJESAHEB TAMBOLI

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, LATUR AND ORS Advocate for Applicant : Mr Patil Laxmikant C. AGP for Respondents: Mr C V Dharurkar / S P Sonpavale/ B V Virdhe/ A M Phule/ S S Dande/G O Wattamwar Advocate for Respondents : Mr S. G. Sangle CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated: February 24, 2017 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court has permitted the applicant to withdraw the amount and so far as clause 'b' of the said order is concerned, the applicant is ready to furnish Bank guarantee instead of solvent surety as directed by the Court to the extent of

withdrawal of 25% amount.

2.

Learned counsel for respondent has no objection. 3.

In view of the same, the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause B. Civil applications disposed of. ( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) aaa/-