Deepak S/O. Parshuram Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Cri. Appln. No.283/20

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 283 OF 2020 Deepak s/o. Purshuram Jadhav, Age 24 years, Occu. Service, R/o. At Shirodi, Tq. Kanad, Dist. Aurangabad.

....Applicant.

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra Through the Police Inspector, Nandurbar City Police Station, Tq. Nandurbar, District Nandurbar.

2.

Deepak s/o. Namdev Patil, Age 46 years, Occu. Service, R/o. Plot No. 34-A, Jagatap Wadi, Nandurbar, Tq. & District Nandurbar ....Respondents. Mr. C.V. Bhadane, Advocate for applicant.

Mr. R.D. Sanap, APP for respondent No. 1/State. Mr. Shivraj V. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No. 2. CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE AND M.G. SEWLIKAR, JJ.

DATED : 04/03/2020.

ORAL JUDGMENT :

1) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the sides for fnal disposal.

2) Present proceeding is fled for relief of quashing of F.I.R. No. 390/2017 registered with Nandurbar City Police Station for the ofence punishable under section 363 of I.P.C. The crime is registered on the basis of report given by respondent No. 2

Cri. Appln. No.283/20 Deepak.

3) In the F.I.R. he has made allegations that his daughter, who was minor left home on 16.11.2017 at 7.00 a.m. and she did not return to home. She had taken with her gold ornaments weighing 7 tola. He gave frst missing report to police on 17.11.2017. When he received information against present applicant that applicant had induced and had taken her away he gave report against him on 29.11.2017.

4) During arguments, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned counsel for informant submitted that parties have settled the dispute. They submitted that the girl is now major and her marriage was solemnized with the present applicant and she has one issue also from the applicant. This kind of submission was made by the learned counsel for informant. Afdavit of informant is on the record to the aforesaid efect. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and nature of dispute, this Court holds that relief needs to be given. In the result, the application is allowed. Relief is granted in terms of prayer clause 'B'. Rule is made absolute in those terms. [ M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.] [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/