← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1127/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Al Raheman Education And Welfare Foundation Latur Through Its Secretary And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-05-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde2 pages

1125.16wp+ FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO.1125 OF 2016 WITH WP/1126/2016 WITH WP/1127/2016 WITH WP/1128/2016 WITH WP/1131/2016 ANAND PRATISHTHAN LATUR DIST LATUR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Ghute Patil Kishor J. & Mr.M P Tripathi AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.B.

Yawalkar.

Advocate for Respondent 5: Mr.D.S. Mali.

...

CORAM:S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

Dated: MAY 05, 2016 ...

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP appearing for the State and learned Counsel for respondent No.5.

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the proposals with favourable recommendations by respondent No.2 for running 5th to 7th

1125.16wp+ standards as per natural growth, are pending with respondent No.1. However, respondent No.1 has not taken decision on the said proposals.

In the light of the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioners, we direct respondent No.1 to take decision, if already not taken, on all the five proposals, which are subject matter of the aforementioned five writ petitions, as expeditiously as possible; however, on or before 15th June, 2016.

With the above observations, all the writ petitions stand disposed of.

Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this order.

(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/