Jivan Nanasaheb Doke And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Beed And Another

990 ca.3115.17 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 990 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3115 OF 2017 IN FA/702/2016 WITH CA/3116/2017 IN FA/702/2016 JIVAN NANASAHEB DOKE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, BEED AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Shinde Chandrakant K. AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.S. Dande .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 3rd MARCH, 2017 PER COURT:- 1.

Heard both sides. Considering the challenge made to the impugned judgment and award passed by the Reference Court, the applicants in both the civil applications, are permitted to withdraw the amount, as described below:- I) 50% of the amount on furnishing undertaking that in the event any adverse order is passed against them in the appeal, they shall re-deposit the amount within four months of passing of such order.

ii) 25% amount is permitted to be withdrawn by the applicant on furnishing solvent surety to the satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

990 ca.3115.17 -2Iii) 25% of the amount be invested in fixed deposit receipt in any Nationalized bank, initially for a period of three years and the same shall be renewed thereafter from time to time until further orders.

2.

Both civil applications are accordingly disposed of. ( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/