← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1647/2009admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

The Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. The Director Of Sugar And ORS

2016-07-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane2 pages

{1} 1647.09 wp sr. 213.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1647 OF 2009 THE MULA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD

VERSUS

THE DIRECTOR OF SUGAR AND ORS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. H D Deshmukh AGP for Respondents: Mr. B.V. Virdhe.

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 5TH JULY , 2016.

PER COURT:

1] Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel submits that the petitioner Karkhana is a cooperative society registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, which is not financed by the State Government, nor is controlled by the Government. As such, same would not come within the ambit and purview of the RTI Act. We have heard the learned AGP also.

2] The issue in the present matter is no longer res-integra in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Thallapplam Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. State of Kearala and others reported in (2013) 16 SCC 82.

3] In the present matter also, there is nothing on record to show that the petitioner Karkhana is financed by the State or is otherwise substantially controlled by the Government. The case of the petitioner would be covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Thallappalam supra.

{2} 1647.09 wp sr. 213.odt 4] In the light of that, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (D). Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. [K.K. SONAWANE] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE.

grt/-