Prakash Shrirang Salve v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 WRIT PETITION NO.1456 OF 2019 RAKESH SHANKARRAO BIRADAR ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Shrimant R. Kedar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. Kiran B. Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.

...

AND 905 WRIT PETITION NO.1459 OF 2019 SHRI BALAJI MAJUR SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYA KHADKI DEVLATHROUGH CHAIRMAN DATTATRAY ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS AND 906 WRIT PETITION NO.1460 OF 2019 SHRI BALAJI MAJUR SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYA KHADKI DEVLATHROUGH CHAIRMAN DATTATRAY ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS AND 907 WRIT PETITION NO.1462 OF 2019 PRAKASH SHRIRANG SALVE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS

(2) AND 908 WRIT PETITION NO.1463 OF 2019 SHRI BALAJI MAJUR SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYA KHADKI DEVLATHROUGH CHAIRMAN DATTATRAY ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Shrimant R. Kedar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondents-State.

Mr. Kiran B. Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.

...

AND 909 WRIT PETITION NO.1470 OF 2019 RAJESH SHANKARRAO BIRADAR ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Shrimant R. Kedar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. Kiran B. Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.

...

AND 910 WRIT PETITION NO.1691 OF 2019 PRAKASH SHRIRANG SALVE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Shrimant R. Kedar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. Kiran B. Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.

...

(3) CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 13th JUNE, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

As only direction is sought to decide the representation, we are considering the writ petitions.

2.

Mr. Jadhavar, learned counsel appears for respondent nos.2 to 4. The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for respondent no.1.

3.

Mr. Jadhavar, learned counsel submits that, in case, representation is pending, the Authority would take decision upon it on its own merits.

4.

In case, representation of petitioners with regard to the payment of money is pending with respondent no.2/3, then the respondent no.2/3 and/or competent authority shall take decision upon it on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months.

5.

Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/June-19