Santosh Prabhakar Narwade v. The State Of Maharashtra

- 1 - ba162.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 162 OF 2022 Santosh Prabhakar Narwade Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. S. B. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V. S. Badakh, APP for respondent/State.

WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 103 OF 2022 Mukesh S/o Sukhbir Lahot Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. A. K. Bhosle, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V. S. Badakh, APP for respondent/State.

CORAM : M.G. Sewlikar, J.

DATE : 2nd MARCH, 2022.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard Shri Jadhav, learned counsel for applicant in Bail Application No. 162/2022 and Shri Bhosle, learned counsel for applicant in Bail Application No. 103/2022.

- 2 - ba162.22.odt 2.

Learned APP submits on instructions that the trial is on the verge of completion. Evidence of Investigating Offcer is in progress.

3.

In view of this, trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt of writ. If trial does not get concluded within a period of three months, the applicants are at liberty to renew their request. 4.

Both the applications stand disposed of.

( M. G. SEWLIKAR ) Judge dyb