The State Of Maharashtra v. Pratibha W/O Bandu Jadhav And ANR

(1) Cri. Appln. No. 510 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Criminal Application No. 510 of 2015 The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Inspector, MIDC Waluj Police Station, .. Applicant Aurangabad City.

(Original complainant) versus

1. Pratibha w/o. Bandu Jadhav, Age : 22 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. RX-5/9, House No.2, Aniket Housing Society, Bajajnagar, MIDC, Waluj, Aurangabad.

2. Babu s/o. Vitthalrao Nagalgave, Age : 48 years, Occupation : Private Service, R/o. RX-5/9, House No.2, Aniket Housing Society, Bajajnagar, MIDC, Waluj, .. Respondents Aurangabad.

(Original accused) .........................

Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the applicant - State.

..........................

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 11TH MARCH 2015

(2) Cri. Appln. No. 510 of 2015 PER COURT :

1.

Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the applicant - State.

2.

Perused the findings recorded by the trial court. 3.

Prima facie it appears that the evidence on record has not been properly considered by the learned trial court. In that view of the matter, case is established for grant of leave to file appeal and admission of the appeal.

4.

In the circumstances, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses "A", "B", "C" and "F". The Application stands disposed of accordingly.

5.

Appeal Admit.

6.

Issue notices to the respondents upon admission of the appeal. 7.

Action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to follow against respondent nos.1 and 2 (original accused), before the Sessions Court, Aurangabad, ( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.S. SHINDE ) JUDGE JUDGE ................................

puranik / CRIAPPLN510.15