← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/3327/2019delay condonatedrejected

The State Of Maharashtra And ORS v. Prashant Ramesh Salunke U/G Of His Mother Sumanbai

2023-09-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant3 pages

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 24 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3327 OF 2019 IN FAST/2784/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS VS PRASHANT RAMESH SALUNKE WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3317 OF 2019 IN FAST/2726/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VS REVANSIDDHA DATTATRAYA MAIRAN (DIED) THR LRS SUNANDA AND ORS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3315 OF 2019 IN FAST/2736/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS VS ARUN PRABHAKAR SALUNKE WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3319 OF 2019 IN FAST/2775/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VS MOTIRAM NARHARI TAT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3323 OF 2019 IN FAST/2771/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS VS RAOSAHEB RAJENDRA TAT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3325 OF 2019 IN FAST/2780/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS VS VASANT YASHWANTRAO SALUNKE

(2) Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for the applicant/State Mr. R. D. Khadap, Advocate for the respondents CORAM :

KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE :

12th SEPTEMBER, 2023 P. C.

1.

These application are filed by the State for condonation of delay. In the appeal challenge is raised to the award passed by the learned Reference Court enhancing the amount of compensation awarded to the respondents- original claimants. The amount is enhanced by 6-8 times by the learned Reference Court. While filing the appeals, the file is routed through various authorities and branches. It is for this reasons the delay is caused. There is no intention to cause delay but same is caused because of the procedure that is required to be followed which took sometime.

2.

Learned advocate for the original claimants opposes the application stating that delay is more than four years and in some cases it is also 5 years and more and no sufficient reasons

(3) are mentioned.

3.

However, considering that these are the appeals by the State and considering the reasons given in the application, this court feels that the applications deserve to be allowed. Hence, the application is thus allowed. Delay stands condoned. Office to register the appeals.

[KISHORE C. SANT, J.] VishalK/24ca3327.19