← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/129/2025disposed off

Sayyad Mohsin S/O. Sayyad Noor v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025-03-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker3 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:6840

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 129 OF 2025 SAYYAD MOHSIN S/O. SAYYAD NOOR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr.R.A.Shinde a/w. Adv.K.R.Doke APP for Respondent-State : Mr.Ruchir S. Wani ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 07.03.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 0348/2024, registered with Jawahar Nagar Police Station, Dist. Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, for the offence punishable under Sections 3

(1) (ii), 3 (2), 3 (4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999, under Section 351 (3), 351 (2), 310 (2), 191 (2), 189 (4), 189 (2), 109 of the B.N.S. and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act and Section 4, 25 of the Arms Act.

3] This Court, by order dated 17.02.2025, has granted interim protection in favour of the applicant, for the reasons statd in para no.3, as noted below :

3.

Today, it is made known to this Court that the MCOC Act is not applicable to the present applicant. Considering the same, the interim protection granted to the applicant is confirmed.

4] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of the aforesaid order, the applicant has attended the concerned police station and has co-operated with the investigation.

5] The aforesaid fact is not disputed by the learned APP. Nothing further adverse is found against the present applicant.

6] In view of the same, the interim protection granted by order dated 17.02.2025 stands confirmed, in the following terms :

i] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required by the investigating officer.

ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

7] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

8] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

9] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC