Baburao Rangnathrao Mane And Others v. Abhinav Goyal And Others

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 CONT. PETITION NO.178 OF 2021 IN WP/439/2019 WITH CA/6146/2022 IN CP/178/2021 BABURAO RANGNATHRAO MANE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

ABHINAV GOYAL AND OTHERS Mr. S. K. Mathpati, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. P. R. Tandale, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. S. G. Sangle, AGP for the respondents/State CORAM:RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

DATE:13th June, 2022 P. C.

1.

We have heard the learned Advocates for the respective sides. The learned Advocate representing the CEO, Zilla Parishad, Latur submits that within three months, sanction granted by the government vide communication dated 03-06-2022, would be implemented and these petitioners would be benefited. He contends that their grievance, therefore, would stand redressed.

(2) 2.

The learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that the statement may be recorded and if the benefits are not extended by the Zilla Parishad, Latur within three months, it may be treated as aggravated contempt.

3.

The learned Advocate representing the CEO, Zilla Parishad, Latur submits that these petitioners, who are retired employees and are senior citizen, have to co-operate with the Zilla Parishad, Latur for completing the procedural formalities which includes presentation of their service books etc. The learned Advocate expects fullest co-operation.

4.

In view of above, this petition is disposed off by recording the statement of the learned Advocate for the CEO, Zilla Parishad that benefits

(3) in view of the communication dated 03-06-2022, would be extended to the petitioners on or before 15-102022, and these petitioners would co-operate in completing the procedural formalities.

5.

The pending civil applications, if any, would not survive and stand disposed off.

[ANIL L. PANSARE, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] VishalK/cp178.21