← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5512/2013admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Kishan Sayanna Dubbewar v. The State Of Mah And ORS

2015-07-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.T. Joshi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD C.A.NO.5503/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.847/2012 (Suryakant Kishanrao Tarkant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND C.A.NO.5504/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.822/2012 (Rajeshwar Laxman Tarkante and Ors Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND C.A.NO.5505/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.842/2012 (Prabhavati Vithalrao Kunte Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND C.A.NO.5506/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.858/2012 (Koinbee Ismail and another Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND C.A.NO.5507/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.849/2012 (Babu Laxman Golewar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND C.A.NO.5508/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.854/2012 (Survar Babansab and anr Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND C.A.NO.5509/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.826/2012 (Sayed Samir Sayed Kaisar and ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND C.A.NO.5510/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.828/2012 (Shabana Begum Sayed Masood and ors Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.)

AND C.A.NO.5511/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.844/2012 (Ranukabai Baburajesh Kunte and anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors.) AND C.A.NO.5512/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.856/2012 (Kishan Sayanna Dubbewar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND C.A.NO.5513/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.830/2012 (Babumiya Maheboob and anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND C.A.NO.5514/2013 IN REJECTED CASE NO.852/2012 (Noorkhan Maheboob Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) ---- Mr. N.S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the applicant in all the applications Mrs.B.B. Gunjal, A.P.P. for the respondent-State in all the applications ---- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 13/07/2015 ORAL ORDER :

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay caused in filing the present applications is condoned. For the similar reasons, the order of the Registrar, in all these matters, refusing the

registration of the Civil Applications for condonation of delay caused in preferring civil revision applications and the Civil Revision Applications, is hereby set aside. All the civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing civil revision applications and the civil revision applications are restored to the file of the learned Registrar, subject to the condition that the office objections would be removed on or before 27th August, 2015.

3.

All the present civil applications are accordingly allowed and disposed of.

[M.T. JOSHI] JUDGE npj/ca5503-2013-group