← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/124/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Prakash Sambhaji Waghmare v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2020-01-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat3 pages

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.124 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11906 OF 2016 Shri. Prakash s/o Sambhaji Waghmare, Age: 47 years, Occu: Service, having office address Narayanrao Waghmare Mahavidhyalaya, Akhada, Balapur, Tal. Kalamnuri, Dist. Hingoli ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 & ors.

..RESPONDENTS Mr G. A. Gadhe, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr S. P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2; Mr N. B. Khandare, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 & 6 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.125 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1561 OF 2017 Dr. Sudhakar s/o Raosaheb Gadhe, Age: 47 years, Occu: Service, R/o. C/o. Jagal, Near Gajanan Mandir, Akhada-Balapur, Tq. Kallamnuri & Dist. Hingoli ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 & ors.

..RESPONDENTS Mr G. A. Gadhe, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr S. P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2; Mr N. B. Khandare, Advocate for respondent No.5

(2) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.126 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1671 OF 2017 Dr. Dadasaheb s/o Devidasrao Kadam, Age: 47 years, Occu: Service, R/o. C/o. Jagal, Near Gajanan Mandir, Akhada-Balapur, Tq. Kallamnuri & Dist. Hingoli ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 & ors.

..RESPONDENTS Mr G. A. Gadhe, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr S. P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2; Mr N. B. Khandare, Advocate for respondent No.5 CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATE : 29th January, 2020 ORAL ORDER:

Contempt Petition No.125 of 2019 and Contempt Petition No.126 of 2019 are not on board and the same are taken on board. 2.

A common grievance raised in these contempt petitions was of non compliance of the order of this Court. It was submitted by Mr Khandare, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent - Institute, namely, Chhatrapati Shahu Shikshan Sanstha Akhada-

(3) Balapur, Tal. Kalamnuri, Dist. Hingoli that prior to filing of the present contempt petitions, the order of this Court is duly complied with. Learned Counsel for the petitioners admits this statement and further submitted that the grievance of the petitioners no more survives.

3.

In view of above, the present contempt petitions are disposed of accordingly.

(R. G. AVACHAT, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) sjk