Satish Kondiba Tartekar v. The State Of Mah And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1345 OF 2005 Satish Kondiba Tartekar

...Petitioner

versus The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents.

---- Mr. Ajinkya Kale, Advocate h/f Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.K. Tambe, Asstt.Govt.Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 ---- CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 30, 2017 PER COURT :

1.

It appears that with the passage of time, the purpose underlying the Writ Petition gets worked out under the interim order, since petitioner has under gone D.Ed. course and has also been issued certificate of passing the same successfully.

2.

In view of the aforesaid, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause "A" and in terms of interim order. [SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] nbs/c-201/30