← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1374/2024disposed off

Prakash Narayandas Rizwani v. Bank Of India Through The Branch Manager Nanded

2024-02-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:2599

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1372 OF 2024 IN REVIEW APPLICAITON (CIVIL)(ST) NO. 2766/2024 IN WP/11556/2023 MAYADEVI NARAYANDAS RIZWANI DIED THROUGH LRS VIJAY NARAYANDAS RIZWANI AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

BANK OF INDIA THROUGH THE BRANCH MANAGER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1373 OF 2024 IN REVIEW APPLICAITON (CIVIL)(ST) NO. 2768/2024 IN WP/6831/2023 VIJAY NARAYANDAS RIZWANI

VERSUS

BANK OF INDIA THROUGH THE BRANCH MANAGER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1374 OF 2024 IN REVIEW APPLICAITON (CIVIL)(ST) NO. 2770/2024 IN WP/11578/2023 PRAKASH NARAYANDAS RIZWANI

VERSUS

BANK OF INDIA THROUGH THE BRANCH MANAGER ....

Advocate for Appliants : Mr. S.S. Bora ...

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 02 FEBRUARY 2024 PER COURT :

These civil applications are for condonation of delay of 19 days in preferring applications for Review.

2.

By common order dated 05.12.2023, three Writ Petitions were disposed of. The applicants have filed Review Applications along with applications for delay.

3.

I have considered the grounds for condonation of delay as well as merits of applications for Review. Considering the explanation stated in paragraph nos. 3 and 4 of the application for condonation of delay, I am inclined to allow the applications. As it is delay of only 19 days and simultaneously I have considered the submissions on merits of the applications for Review, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the respondent before considering these applications for condonation of delay finally.

4.

For the reasons stated in the applications, applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause 6 (b). Office is directed to register Review Applications.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] Thakur-Chauhan/-