← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6353/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Prafulla Mukeshrao Deshmukh v. Rashtriya Sahkari Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Ltd Chalisgaon Through Chairman And Others

2019-09-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 145 WRIT PETITION NO.6353 OF 2019 PRAFULLA MUKESHRAO DESHMUKH

VERSUS

RASHTRIYA SAHKARI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL LTD CHALISGAON THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OT ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Patil Paresh B.

AGP for Respondents State : Mr S P Tiwari Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Mukund D Gitte

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATE : 24th September, 2019 ORDER:

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has applied for appointment on compassionate ground. The said application is not considered. The learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits that vacancy exists but because of ban on recruitment, appointment cannot be made.

2.

Time and again we have held that ban on recruitment would not apply to the compassionate appointment. The respondents may consider the claim of the petitioner as per seniority, wait list maintained for the person to be appointed on compassionate ground. Respondent no.2 will also have take precaution that percentage of the persons to be appointed on compassionate ground is maintained and

the persons above the maximum allowed to be appointed on compassionate ground would not be appointed. With these observations, the respondents may take further steps for appointment of petitioner on compassionate ground as per his qualification.

3.

Writ petition disposed of. No costs.

(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) JPC