← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/2501/2023delay condonatedrejected

Murlidhar Rama Patil Died Thr Lrs Sopan Murlidhar Patil v. The S.L.A.O. 2 Utph, Jalgaon And ANR

2023-07-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

1 4 ca 2501-23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 4 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2023 IN FAST/2912/2023 MURLIDHAR RAMA PATIL DIED THR LRS SOPAN MURLIDHAR PATIL

VERSUS

THE S.L.A.O. 2 UTPH, JALGAON AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant:Ms. Kirti Deshpande h/f Mr. M. M. Bhokarikar AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. R. D. Sanap ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 24/07/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 2223 days, which appears to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition. 3.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay. The acquiring body despite service, remained absent. 4.

As such, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 2223 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay. 5.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. The application is accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-