Radhakishan Gopinath Pandit v. State Of Maha And ORS

(1) 219-wp-2669-2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 219 WRIT PETITION NO. 2669 OF 2004 RADHAKISHAN GOPINATH PANDIT ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTA & ORS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. A. D. Shinde (absent), Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. U. M. Bopshetty (absent), Advocate for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATED : 24th NOVEMBER, 2018.

PER COURT:- 1.

The matter appears to have been filed in public interest. The petition was basically filed seeking directions to construct and develop the Aurangabad and Paithan Road in front of Nath Seeds Company as per the Development Plan in straight line and by constructing a new bridge.

2.

The respondents had undertaken the work of widening bridge, which according to the petitioner is improper. The affidavit at the relevant time was filed by respondent no.3-M.S.R.D.C.. The recommendations of the committee were considered. The committee also recommended to

(2) 219-wp-2669-2004 widen the bridge and accordingly work was undertaken. There is imperative need to widen the existing narrow bridge to avoid accidents.

3.

It is submitted that the work of the widening of the bridge has already been undertaken and completed.

4.

In view of that, as the work of widening of bridge is already completed, nothing would survive in the present petition.

5.

In case the grievance of the petitioner subsist, then petitioner may take appropriate steps in that regard. Rule discharged. No costs.

(R. G. AVACHAT) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/November-18