← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1378/2024disposed off

Sagar Buddhamrao Wankhede v. The State Of Maharashtra Principal Secretary Medical Education And Drug Department

2024-02-02Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:2304-DB 1 933-wp 1378-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1378 OF 2024 Dr. Sagar Buddhamrao Wankhede and others .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. Swapnil M. Mule, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for Respondents/State.

CORAM :

SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATE : 02nd FEBRUARY, 2024.

PER COURT :- .

Heard both the sides.

2.

The petitioners who are resident Doctors, are claiming a direction similar to the one issued in several Writ Petitions, by way of a common order dated 01st December 2022, in Writ Petition No. 9813 of 2022 and connected matters and in Writ Petition No. 12033 of 2023 dated 29th September, 2023.

3.

For the same reasons as indicated therein, we dispose of the petition with the following directions :

a.

Let all these petitioners, either individual or jointly, file representations to respondent nos. 1 and 2 within a

2 933-wp 1378-2024.odt period of two weeks. They may send such representations even through e-mail to these two respondents. b.

After receipt of such representations/e-mails, respondent Nos. 1 and 2, in co-ordination with each other and after taking appropriate feedback from the Dean of the Medical College, would consider whether identically placed students are granted such benefits and in case such benefits have been granted, these petitioners would also be granted the benefits on parity.

c.

Let the above verification exercise be completed and appropriate orders be issued within four weeks. d.

If any of these petitioners are found to be ineligible, a reasoned order be passed and the same be communicated to the concerned petitioner within 15 days from the date of such order.

e.

The aggrieved petitioner would then be at liberty to challenge the said decision/reasons by resorting to a remedy as is permissible in Law.

( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) ( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE JUDGE P.S.B.