Satish Shahaji Fand v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1 cp 61.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1919 OF 2013 Satish Shahaji Fand .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri S. A. Wakure, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri D. R. Korde, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. J. Ghute Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 01ST JULY, 2015.

PER COURT :

.

It is submitted that, after filing of contempt petition the petitioner is issued with appointment order, but the same is not in consonance with the order passed by this Court. Subsequently the orders are also issued for payment of backwages. The only grievance of the petitioner is that clause 6 of the order prohibits the petitioner from getting Class - C post. In the original writ petition also the same was agitated, which was negatived. Even the S.L.P. is dismissed. Clause 6 of the appointment order dated 18.03.2015 is set aside.

2 cp 61.15 2.

The petitioner after acquiring qualification of Class III and if found eligible and fit, so also by considering all relevant factor and availability of admissible post be considered for the Class III post. The same would be on satisfying all the eligibility criterias. The contempt petition according disposed of. No costs. [ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/July 15