Subhash Shamrao Vibhute v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

984, 985, 988 (delay).odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 984 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12742 OF 2013 IN FAST/25166/2013 KHELMARAJ DAMODAR PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Suryawanshi Nima R. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. R.B. Bagul Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mrs. Vaishali D. Jadhav ...

985 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13260 OF 2013 IN FAST/25319/2013 GOKUL CHADANMAL SINGHAVI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Suryawanshi Nima R. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. A.M. Phule Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mrs. Vaishali D. Jadhav ...

988 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9668 OF 2016 IN FAST/3336/2011 WITH CA/9669/2016 IN FAST/3341/2011 SUBHASH SHAMRAO VIBHUTE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sontakke Patil B.R. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.P. Deshmukh ...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : 4th OCTOBER, 2019.

984, 985, 988 (delay).odt ORDER :

.

Present applications have been filed by the original claimants for condonation of delay in filing first appeals. They want to challenge the judgment and award passed by the learned reference Court. Learned AGP as well as learned Advocate for acquiring body raised strong objection on the ground that the delay is inordinate and not properly explained. 2.

Taking into consideration the fact that the lands of the applicants were acquired and they are coming from rural area, liberal approach is taken, delay stands condoned.

3.

Civil Applications stand allowed and disposed of accordingly. 4.

It is clarified that the applicants will not be entitled to get interest for the period of delay, in case of success to their respective appeals.

5.

Registry to verify and register the first appeals and place them for further consideration on 15.01.2020.

(SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.) SCM