Ahilyadevi Mahila Sevabhavi And Bahu Uddeshiya Sanstha, Beed v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 WP - 2380-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2380 OF 2014 AHILAYADEVI MAHILA SEVABHAVI AND BAHU UDDESHIYA SANSTHA, BEED THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. C.V. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Malhari S. Adate, Advocate h/f. Mr. N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for respondents no. 4 and 5 Mr. S.N. Kendre, AGP for respondent-State Mr. P.S. Dighe, Advocate for respondents no. 6 and 7 ...

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 03-12-2018 ORDER :

1.

Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, states that the petition loses out all its efficacy, since many developments have taken place post institution of petition and petition, in the circumstances, has been rendered infructuous. 2.

Writ petition, therefore, is disposed of as infructuous. [S.M. GAVHANE] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE arp/