← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1784/2024dismissed

Amit Rameshkumar Agrawal v. Nikita Amit Agrawal And Another

2024-02-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:3353 WP 1784/2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 WRIT PETITION NO. 1784 OF 2024 Amit Rameshkumar Agrawal ....Petitioner

VERSUS

Nikita Amit Agrawal And Another .....Respondent .....

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Jain Vishwajeet Ramesh Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr. Ashish Agrawal .....

CORAM

: ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

Dated : February 13, 2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By way of present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 11.1.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad on the application below Exh. 233 in Special Civil Suit No. 146/2017. The application, Exh. 233, filed under section 20(2) of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act is rejected by the Court below. 3.

The learned counsel submits that the petitioner/husband has divorced the respondent/wife and she has withdrawn Rs.40,00,000/- given to her in final settlement. He further submits that no further maintenance can be awarded to the child after he has attained majority. 4.

Mr. Ashish Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that respondent has filed appeal against the divorce decree. and in the appeal, he has filed application before this Court to redeposit amount of Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees thirty lakhs). The learned counsel submits that he has prepared the F.Ds. of the above amount and he will give the details of the F.Ds. and also file photo-copies of the F.Ds. during the course of the

WP 1784/2024 day before this Court and he will not liquidate the F.Ds. till the next date or until the further orders passed by this Court. 5.

In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, I see no error in the impugned order. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed.

6.

However, if the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent is found to be incorrect, liberty is granted to the petitioner to mention this matter, so also to initiate the appropriate proceedings/ action against the respondent.

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ssc/