← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/1986/2012withdrawn

The Executive Engineer, Dhule Medium Project v. Motiram Baliram Thelari And ORS

2016-03-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1986 OF 2012 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DHULE MEDIUM PROJECT

VERSUS

MOTIRAM BALIRAM THELARI AND ORS WITH FA/1989/2012 WITH FA/1990/2012 WITH FA/1991/2012 902 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2000 OF 2012 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DHULE MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISIONNO.1

VERSUS

CHATRU LAKHA VANJARI AND ORS 903 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2007 OF 2012 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DHULE MEDIUM PROJECT

VERSUS

PREMRAJ CHHAGAN VANJARI AND ORS WITH FA/2008/2012 904 FIRST APPEAL NO. 146 OF 2013 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DHULE MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION1.

VERSUS

BHATA KASHIRAM (DIED) BHAGABAI BHALA SARAK (THELARI) AND ORS AGP for Respondents: Mr S R Yadav Advocate for Respondent 6 : Mr S V Bhosale h/f Mr R C Patil 905 FIRST APPEAL NO. 534 OF 2015 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MPD DHULE

VERSUS

DAGA DHONDU THELARI AND ANOTHER

WITH FA/531/2015 WITH FA/573/2015 WITH FA/575/2015 WITH FA/576/2015 WITH FA/579/2015 WITH FA/580/2015 WITH FA/587/2015 WITH FA/591/2015 WITH FA/593/2015 AGP for Respondents: Mr S R Yadav Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr V D Gunale 906 FIRST APPEAL NO. 615 OF 2015 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MPD DHULE

VERSUS

DHONDU SAKHARAM THELARI AND ANOTHER AGP for Respondents: Mr S R Yadav Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr V D Gunale 907 FIRST APPEAL NO. 618 OF 2015 WITH CA/11310/2014 IN FA/618/2015 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MPD DHULE

VERSUS

DASBHAU RAJARAM PATIL AND ANOTHER WITH FA/625/2015 WITH FA/642/2015 WITH CA/11333/2014 IN FA/642/2015

AGP for Respondents: Mr S R Yadav/D R Korde/Mr. C.V.Dharurkar/Mr K N. Lokhande Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr V D Gunale CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated: March 10, 2016 PER COURT :- 1.

The learned counsel for the appellant, on written instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the First Appeals. Said written communication issued by the Executive Director and Executive Engineer respectively are taken on record and marked 'X' and 'Y' respectively, for identification. 2.

Leave granted.

3.

First Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. Pending civil applications are also disposed of.

4.

The respondent/original claimants may withdraw the amount, if deposited before the Executing Court. 5.

The appellants are entitled to refund of the Court Fees, as permissible in law.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) aaa/-