Suryakant Dnyandeo Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2285 OF 2015 IN WP/9497/2013 SURYAKANT DNYANDEO PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Talhar Ajay G.

AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. V. D. Rakh Advocate for respondent No.3: Mr. S. B. Yawalkar Advocate for Respondents 4 and 5 : Mr. S. R. Barlinge ...

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & V.K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE :

20th February, 2015 PER COURT :

1.

This application is seeking leave to amend the writ petition. Writ petition is not yet admitted. Learned counsel for the respondents opposes the application. The respondents will have every opportunity to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of amendment. It is trite that merits of the amendment is not required to be considered while deciding the amendment application.

2.

In the light of above, the civil application for the purpose of amendment is allowed in terms of prayer clause B. Necessary amendment be carried out within 14 days. Civil application disposed of. (V.K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 1/1