← Library
Bombay High CourtPIL/10/2012disposed offdismissed for default

Sanjay Tukaram Autade And ANR v. The State Of Mah And ORS

2020-02-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane3 pages

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.10 OF 2012 Sanjay s/o Tukaram Autade & another Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.Pradeep Deshmukh, advocate holding for Mr.H.A.Joshi, advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.S.J.Salgare, AGP for Respondent No.1.

Mr.V.D.Hon, Senior Counsel i/by Mr.A.V.Hon, advocate for Respondents No.2 & 3.

Mr.A.D.Shinde, advocate for Respondents No.4, 6 & 7. Mr.Ajit Gaikwad Patil, advocate holding for Mr.U.M.Bopshetty, advocate for intervenor.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ AND S.M.GAVHANE, J J.

DATE : 24th February, 2020.

P.C. :

After arguing the matter for some time, the learned advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the State Government with the representation seeking indulgence of the State Government to work out the best possible solution in the matter, in public interest.

The learned Senior Advocate appearing for Respondents No.2 and 3 and learned advocate for Respondents

{2} No.4, 6 & 7, oppose the request made on behalf of the petitioners and submit that heavy costs be imposed on the petitioners.

After considering rival submissions, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this PIL as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to approach the State Government with representation, if advised. If such representation is made, the State Government shall take decision on it within six months from the date of receipt of the representation. Needless to say that the petitioners shall send copy of the representation to Respondents No.2 to 7 by Registered Post A.D./Speed Post and the State Government shall also grant hearing to the petitioners as well as Respondents before taking any decision in the matter. S.M.GAVHANE Z.A.HAQ JUDGE JUDGE adb

{3}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4438 OF 2012 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.10 OF 2012 Mango Growers Association, Aurangabad Applicant

Versus

Sanjay s/o Tukaram Autade & othes Respondents Mr.Ajit Gaikwad Patil, advocate holding for Mr.U.M.Bopshetty, advocate for intervenor Mr.Pradeep Deshmukh, advocate holding for Mr.H.A.Joshi, advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2 (orig. petitioners). Mr.S.J.Salgare, AGP for Respondent No.3.

Mr.V.D.Hon, Senior Counsel i/by Mr.A.V.Hon, advocate for Respondents No.4 & 5.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ AND S.M.GAVHANE, J J.

DATE : 24th February, 2020.

P.C. :

In view of disposal of the Public Interest Litigation itself, no orders are required to be passed on the Civil Application.

Civil Application is disposed of.

S.M.GAVHANE Z.A.HAQ JUDGE JUDGE adb