Devidas Tilakchand Kuche v. The Returning Officer And Others

wp1623.17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1623 OF 2017 Devidas s/o Tilakchand Kuche .. PETITIONER

VERSUS

The Returning Officer & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Thombre & Mr. V.A. Bagal, advocates for petitioner. Mr. A.V. Deshmukh, AGP for the State Mr. V.S. Kadam, advocate for respondents 1 and 4. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1626 OF 2017 Devidas s/o Tilakchand Kuche .. PETITIONER

VERSUS

The Returning Officer & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Thombre & Mr. V.A. Bagal, advocates for petitioner. Ms. R.P. Gour, AGP for the State Mr. V.S. Kadam, advocate for respondents 1 and 4. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1630 OF 2017 Vasant s/o namdeo Jagatap .. PETITIONER

VERSUS

The Returning Officer & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Thombre & Mr. V.A. Bagal, advocates for petitioner. Mr. A.B. Basarkar, AGP for the State Mr. V.S. Kadam, advocate for respondents 1 and 4. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1633 OF 2017 Sunanda w/o Avdhut Khadke .. PETITIONER

VERSUS

wp1623.17.doc The Returning Officer & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Thombre & Mr. V.A. Bagal, advocates for petitioner. Mr. A.V. Deshmukh, AGP for the State Mr. V.S. Kadam, advocate for respondents 1 and 4. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1634 OF 2017 Devidas s/o Tilakchand Kuche .. PETITIONER

VERSUS

The Returning Officer & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Thombre & Mr. V.A. Bagal, advocates for petitioner. Mr. A.P. Basarkar, AGP for the State Mr. V.S. Kadam, advocate for respondents 1 and 4. ===== CORAM : S. B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 3rd FEBRUARY, 2017.

PER COURT :

1.

Having heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned AGP for respondent no. 3 and learned counsel for respondents 1 and 4, I am of the view that since alternate remedy is available to redress the grievance raised in these petitions, the petitions are not maintainable. Petitions stand disposed of accordingly. No costs.

( S. B. SHUKRE ) JUDGE dyb