Chandrakant Yuvraj Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) WP No.5733/2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 5733 OF 2018 Chandrakant Yuvraj Patil.

Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others.

Respondents.

*** Mr. S.B. Sontakke, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.T. Bhagat, A.G.P. for the State.

Mr. Sonwane, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*** CORAM :

S.V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.

Dated :

14th June, 2018.

PER COURT :- .

Heard Mr. Sontakke, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sonwane, learned Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the petitioner has remedy of appeal before the Chief Executive Officer. 2.

The order of suspension is passed by the Block Development Officer. In such case, as per Rule 12 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1964, the appeal would lie before the respondent No.2-Chief Executive Officer.

(2) WP No.5733/2018 3.

Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy. All the contentions are kept open. No costs. ( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE vdd/