Popatrao Asaram Mule And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

909-ca-3820-18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3820 OF 2018 IN FAST/3453/2018 POPATRAO ASARAM MULE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ....

Mr. A.R.Kawade, Advocate for the Applicants Mr. N.T. Bhagat, AGP for Respondent No. 1 / State ....

CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 27th APRIL, 2022 PER COURT:- 1.

It is an application for condonation of delay moved by the applicants / claimants.

2.

Heard Mr. Kawade, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. N.T. Bhagat, learned A.g.P. for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 though duly served with notice, remained absent when the matter is called out.

3.

Mr. Kawade, learned counsel for the applicants submits that there is delay of 113 days in preferring the appeal and it may be condoned.

909-ca-3820-18 4.

Mr. Bhagat, learned A.G.P. for respondent No.1 / State oppose to allow this application.

5.

For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay in para Nos. 5 and 6, the delay needs to be condoned in the interest of justice.

O R D E R

(i) The application for condonation of delay is hereby allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

(ii) The Registry to make scrutiny of the appeal and it be numbered and place before the concerned Court for admission.

(iii)Civil application is accordingly disposed of. [ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ] JUDGE S.P. Rane