The Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Divn.1 Dhule v. Shamrao Chintaman Bhill And ANR

2023:BHC-AUG:27352 -1IN THE LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME HELD ON 9th DECEMBER 2023 AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD.

FIRST APPEAL NO.994 OF 2010 EXE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION NO.1 DHULE

VERSUS

SHANABHAU RAJESINH GIRASE AND ANR WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.989 OF 2010 EXE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION NO.1

VERSUS

MANKOBAI GANPATSINH GIRASE (DIED) LRS BHIKA GANPAT GIRASE AND ORS ...

FIRST APPEAL NO.986 OF 2010 EXE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION NO.1 DHULE

VERSUS

GANGJI DONGAR GIRASE AND ORS ...

FIRST APPEAL NO.1650 OF 2010 EXE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DHULE MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION NO.1 DHULE

VERSUS

KASHIRAM NATTHU MORE AND ORS ...

FIRST APPEAL NO.1653 OF 2010 EXE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DHULE MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION NO.1 DHULE

VERSUS

KHUSHAL ZAGA MAHAR AND ANR ...

FIRST APPEAL NO.1671 OF 2010 EXE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION NO.1 DHULE

VERSUS

BHATA DAGA BHOI AND ORS AND

-2FIRST APPEAL NO.1699 OF 2010 EXE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION NO.1 DHULE

VERSUS

LAXMAN NAVAL BHIL AND ORS ...

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3824 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18808 OF 2008 AND FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18808 OF 2008 THE SPECIAL LAND ACQ. OFFICER DHULE AND ANR

VERSUS

SHIVAJI SATRU PATIL AND ORS ...

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2938 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.3583 OF 2012 AND FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.3583 OF 2012 EXE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DHULE MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION NO.1 DHULE

VERSUS

SHAMRAO CHINTAMAN BHILL AND ANR ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ajay D. Pawar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. V. Hange ...

O R D E R

1.

Mr. Ajay Pawar, learned Counsel for the Appellant/ acquiring body alongwith Mr. Hange, AGP are present. 2.

The learned Advocate for the appellant submits that these appeals can be withdrawn in view of the Government Resolution dated 03.11.2016 and the subsequent corrigendums dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018. The learned Advocate therefore seeks permission to withdraw these appeals in view of the aforesaid Government Resolution/policy of the Government.

-33.

As the appeals are covered by the Government Resolution/Policy and can be permitted to withdraw, it is desirable to condone the delay. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay is condoned. The office is directed to register the first appeals.

4.

The first appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. 5.

The Court fees be refunded as per rules.

6.

Award be drawn up accordingly.

7.

Pending Civil Applications if any, stand disposed of. (A. R. Borulkar) (S.G. Shete) (Shailesh P. Brahme, J.) Advocate D. J. (Retired) Head of the Panel Member Member Date: 09.12.2023.

Place: Aurangabad Najeeb