Shaikh Hamid Shaikh Rahim v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

{1} 12 sr. no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4656 OF 2015 WITH CA/1850/2016 IN WP/4656/2015 SHAIKH HAMID SHAIKH RAHIM

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vikram R. Dhorde. AGP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S.N. Morampalle. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar. . . .

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 15th FEBRUARY, 2016.

PER COURT:

1] This is an application seeking amendment for bringing on record additional documents.

2] Mr. Dhorde, learned counsel submits that the applicant could lay its hand on the said documents subsequently. They are relevant for adjudication of the present writ petition.

3] We have also heard the learned counsel for the respondents and learned AGP.

4] The writ petition is not yet admitted. Even otherwise, the respondent can controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of the amendment.

{2} 12 sr. no..odt 5] In the light of the above, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) and disposed of. Respondent No.1 shall file reply to the averments including the amendment to the writ petition, within 3 weeks. 6] S.O. to 7th March, 2016.

[A.M. BADAR] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-