Rajendra Haribhau Tonde v. The State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10292 OF 2018 IN FAST/3451/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10294 OF 2018 IN FAST/3479/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10295 OF 2018 IN FAST/3481/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10297 OF 2018 IN FAST/3485/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10296 OF 2018 IN FAST/3483/2018 ...

MAHADEO GNYANDEO TONDE AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Savant Vilas P Mr. AM Phule, AGP for Respondent-State.

----- CORAM : P.R.BORA, J.

DATE :

4 th September,2018.

PER COURT :

1.

Not on Board. Taken on Board. Heard Shri Savant, leaned counsel appearing for applicants and learned AGP appearing for State. 2.

Delay of 4602 days has occurred in filing these appeals by the original claimants seeking enhancement in the amount of compensation

as awarded by the Reference Court.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are poor agriculturists residing in remote hilly areas. It is further contended that unaware of the legal provisions, and more particularly as about limitation to prefer any such appeal and because of financial difficulties, the applicants could not approach this court with the first appeals within the stipulated period of limitation. The learned counsel submitted that in the year 2017, when the applicants came to know that in similar cases, the State Government has arrived at settlement in Lok Adalat with some other claimants and the amount of compensation is substantially enhanced, the applicants have approached this Court. The learned counsel submitted that the applicants have not received a single pai till today towards the enhanced compensation, as has been enhanced by the Reference Court. The learned counsel submits that in view of the fact that similarly placed

other agriculturists have received the benefits of enhanced compensation because of the settlement in Lok Adalat, the present applicants also need to be granted with the same benefit and as such, their appeals need to be heard on merits.

4.

Shri Phule, learned AGP though opposed for condoning the delay stating that the huge delay has not been sufficiently explained, did not dispute that some of the matters arising out of the same acquisition, are settled in Lok Adalat by the State Government and the amount of compensation is enhanced in those matters. The learned AGP alternatively submitted that the applicants shall not be made entitled for the interest of the period of delay in the event of their success in the appeals.

5.

Learned Counsel Shri Sawant has already submitted that the applicants are ready to waive the interest for the period of delay.

6.

After having considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the

respective parties and more particularly having regard to the fact that some of the matters arising out of the same acquisition, are settled by the State Government in the Lok Adalat and the amount of compensation is enhanced in those matters, I am inclined to allow these applications. Hence, the following order.

ORDER

i.

The delay caused in filing the appeals is condoned.

The Civil Applications for condonation of delay are disposed of.

ii.

The appeals be registered in accordance with law. On registration of the appeals, issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP Shri Phule waive notice for State. Service complete.

iii.

It is clarified that as undertaking by the applicants, they shall not be entitled for the statutory interest of the period of delay in the

event of their success in the appeals.

iv.

Necessary undertaking be filed by the applicants within four weeks.

v.

Copy of the undertaking as well as copy of this order be placed with the papers of appeals.

vi.

List the appeals for further consideration after three weeks.

(P.R.BORA) JUDGE bdv/