Bhimsing Harsing Pawara v. Gitanjali Prakash Patil And Others

910-CA-1343-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1343 OF 2022 IN WP/2549/2018 WITH WP/2549/2018 BHIMSING HARSING PAWARA

VERSUS

GITANJALI PRAKASH PATIL AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sandesh R. Patil Advocate for Non applicatn No. 1 : Mr. Awate h/f Talekar and Associates AGP for Respondents No.2 to 4 -State : Mr. S. P. Tiwari Advocate for Respondents No. 5 and 6 : Mr. N. E. Deshmukh ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 11th FEBRUARY, 2022 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned Advocate for none applicants No. 1.

2.

The learned Advocate for non-applicant No. 1 opposes the application.

3.

Considering the reasons stated in the civil application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses "B" and "C" on condition that office objections shall be removed within a period of three weeks from today. Failure to remove the office objections within stipulated period, entail dismissal of present Civil Application.

4.

The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. ( S.G. DIGE ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE mtk