← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1348/2022disposed off

Bhimsing Harsing Pawara v. Pankaj Jijabrao Pawar And Others

2022-02-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Dige3 pages

1 ca 1336.22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1336 OF 2022 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11622 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2470 OF 2018 Bhimsing S/o Harsing Pawara .. Applicant Peoples Education Society Mandane Through its Chairman J. T. Pawar and others Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.

Shri P. N. Kutti, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1339 OF 2022 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11625 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2469 OF 2018 Bhimsing S/o Harsing Pawara .. Applicant Peoples Education Society Mandane Through its Chairman J. T. Pawar and others Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.

Shri P. N. Kutti, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1348 OF 2022 IN

2 ca 1336.22 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5651 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2550 OF 2018 Bhimsing S/o Harsing Pawara .. Applicant Pankaj Jijabrao Pawar and others Shri U. R. Awati, Advocate i/by Talekar and Associates, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.

Advocate for the Respondent No. 5.

Shri P. N. Kutti, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1349 OF 2022 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5654 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2570 OF 2018 Bhimsing S/o Harsing Pawara .. Applicant Deepak Sahebrao Pawar and others Shri U. R. Awati, Advocate i/by Talekar and Associates, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.

Advocate for the Respondent No. 5.

Shri P. N. Kutti, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1353 OF 2022 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5616 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2553 OF 2018 Bhimsing S/o Harsing Pawara .. Applicant

3 ca 1336.22 Dhairyashil Chandrakant Patil and others Shri U. R. Awati, Advocate i/by Talekar and Associates, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.

Advocate for the Respondent No. 5.

Shri P. N. Kutti, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE :

18TH FEBRUARY, 2022.

FINAL ORDER :

.

This civil applications are filed for restoring the civil applications for intervention. The civil applications are rejected on the ground that office objections were not removed. 2.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clauses "B" and "C" on condition that office objections are removed within a period of two (02) weeks from today, failure to remove the office objections shall entail rejection of civil applications. The civil applications are disposed of.

3.

Place the writ petitions for admission on 17.03.2022. [S. G. DIGE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Feb. 22