Vajirabee Madarsab Vijapure v. The State Of Maharashtra,Through The Collector Latur And ANR

21-CA.2248-25 & ors.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2248 OF 2025 IN FAST/3525/2025 RUKIYABEE KARIMSAB PATHAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2246 OF 2025 IN FAST/3479/2025 AND 22 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3688 OF 2025 IN FAST/9574/2025 MUBARAK LALA PATEL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR DIST. LATUR AND ANR WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3686 OF 2025 IN FAST/9576/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3684 OF 2025 IN FAST/9578/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3685 OF 2025 IN FAST/9581/2025 ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sharad Shankarappa Halkude. AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. V. Hange. Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, respectively.

...

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 04.12.2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Applicants seek to condone delay of 3523 and 3572 days in their respective appeals for the reasons stated in the applications.

21-CA.2248-25 & ors.odt 3.

Learned AGPs oppose the applications.

4.

The averments of the applications have not been controverted. I find no reasons to infer any malafides on the part of the applicants in preferring appeals belatedly. The delay stands condoned on condition that applicants shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.

5.

Civil applications for delay are allowed.

First Appeals 6.

Admit.

7.

Learned AGPs waive service of notice for respondentState. 8.

Call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned Court if not called for.

9.

Print is dispensed with.

10.

The applicants shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.

(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ...

vmk/-