The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Latur And Another v. Vyankat Shamrao Darade

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8214 OF 2014 IN FAST NO.3332 OF 2014 WITH C.A.NO.8198 OF 2014 IN FAST NO.3461 OF 2014 WITH C.A.NO.8200 OF 2014 IN FAST NO.3470 OF 2014 WITH C.A.NO.8204 OF 2014 IN FAST NO.3480 OF 2014 WITH C.A.NO.8206 OF 2014 IN FAST NO.3483 OF 2014 WITH C.A.NO.8208 OF 2014 IN FAST NO.3428 OF 2014 WITH C.A.NO.8210 OF 2014 IN FAST NO.3447 OF 2014 WITH C.A.NO.8212 OF 2014 IN FAST NO.3455 OF 2014.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders Mr.G.R.Ingole, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr.B.R.Kedar, advocate for the Respondents.

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.

Date : 21.08.2015.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Mr.Kedar, learned counsel for the non-applicants opposes the applications on the ground that no sufficient cause is stated in the application. Only administrative reasons are mentioned which is not sufficient for condoning the delay.

3.

I have gone through the reasons enumerated in the applications. The non-applicants have not controverted the reasons stated in the applications.

4.

I have also gone through the Judgment. To meet the ends of justice, it is expedient to condone the delay. 5.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). The delay is condoned. The Civil Applications are disposed of.

(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.21.08.2015.

asp/office/Ca8214.14