Anita W/O Anupsingh Tak v. Manorama Anupsingh Tak And Another

925cra284.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 284 OF 2025 ANITA W/O ANUPSINGH TAK

VERSUS

MANORAMA ANUPSINGH TAK AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Akshara Sharad Madake h/f Ms. Priyanka Prakash Shinde Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. Kulkarni Laxman M. and Mr. Kulkarni Vaibhav B.

...

CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.

DATE : 03.10.2025.

PER COURT :

1.

After hearing the learned Advocate for the applicant for some time, when the Court was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order, at that time, the learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions of her client, seeks leave to withdraw the application, with liberty to file a fresh application before the concerned Court. Her statement is accepted.

2.

In view of the statement, the application is dismissed, as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.

( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) mahajansb/